However, work on these environmental microbiomes is confounded because of the myriad sources of variation in samples from factors like geographic location, surface material, human interaction and environmental conditions. A new paper in the journal mSystems by Greg Caporaso and colleagues has aimed to control for this variation with precise methodology, and attempts to understand how various factors might be contributing to the composition of a microbiome in a BE.
In this study, nine offices in three cities were surveyed over a one year period. They found that it didn’t matter what surface was sampled, whether it was a carpet, tile or drywall. What did matter was where the sample was taken (floor v ceiling) as well as the city where the sample was taken. Surprisingly, offices in the same city had microbiomes that were more similar to each other than they were to offices in different cities.
"This was especially interesting because even within each city, the offices we studied differed from each other in terms of size, usage patterns, and ventilation systems, suggesting that geography is more important than any of these features in driving the bacterial community composition of the offices within the ranges that we studied," said Caporaso. Each city had it’s own, unique microbiome. That meant the researchers were able to identify the city of origin of an unknown sample with 85% accuracy based solely on its microbiome composition. But it wasn’t necessarily about germs that were specific to each city. "One of the differences that we observe is in community richness - the number of types of different species," he said. "The offices in Flagstaff had much higher richness than the offices in San Diego or Toronto. There were many more types of species. We don't know why that is."
With increased knowledge from the study of microbiomes in the BE, we may be able to design better spaces and buildings with microbiomes that are healthier for their inhabitants.
Sources: mSystems, CDC