The study consisted of volunteers who agreed to undergo brain scans while they took part in tasks where they were allowed to lie for personal gain. The brain scans showed that when participants told their first lie, the amygdala, which is the brain region associated with emotion, showed increased activity. As the volunteers continued the task, and the lies grew in significance and complexity the activity first shown in the amygdala declined. The most surprising part of the research was that that as the lies grew, and the activity in the amygdala lessened, the team could use the data to accurately predict which participants would continue to lie in future tasks.
So what were the tasks and how did they involve deceit? 80 volunteers were placed on teams and asked to estimate how many pennies were in a jar. They then had to send these estimates to unseen partners via a computer. Different scenarios of this basic task were presented in which some of the time guessers were told that being as accurate as possible would benefit them and in other tasks they were told that over or under-estimating the amount would result in a personal gain. The gain in some situations came at the expense of their partners. At first, when participants would fudge the numbers there was a spike in amygdala activity but as they continued to falsify the amounts to their partners the activity declined.
Senior study author Dr Tali Sharot from the UCL Department of Experimental Psychology stated, "When we lie for personal gain, our amygdala produces a negative feeling that limits the extent to which we are prepared to lie. However, this response fades as we continue to lie, and the more it falls the bigger our lies become. This may lead to a 'slippery slope' where small acts of dishonesty escalate into more significant lies."
Sharot’s colleague, lead author Dr. Neil Garrett explained the possible connection to becoming desensitized to violence by explaining, "It is likely the brain's blunted response to repeated acts of dishonesty reflects a reduced emotional response to these acts. This is in line with suggestions that our amygdala signals aversion to acts that we consider wrong or immoral. We only tested dishonesty in this experiment, but the same principle may also apply to escalations in other actions such as risk taking or violent behavior."
The video below talks more about the study and what it could mean for research into deceptive and violent behavior.